Incidence of ocular hypertension after anti-VEGF injections: examining the effect of drug filtration and silicone-free syringes



      To examine the difference in incidence of ocular hypertension (OHT) following the introduction of filtered anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) medication in silicone-free syringes.


      Retrospective cohort study.


      A retrospective review of consecutive treatment-naive patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in a group practice was performed. Data from the cohort receiving nonfiltered anti-VEGF in insulin syringes (IS group) was collected from June 2015. Data from the cohort receiving filtered anti-VEGF in silicone-free syringes (SFS group) was collected from June 2019. Follow up data were collected at 1 year. Exclusion criteria included prior anti-VEGF treatment, known glaucoma or diagnosis of glaucoma suspect before anti-VEGF treatment, neovascular glaucoma, steroid use, or vitrectomy during follow-up. Primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg and IOP ≥ 30 mm Hg at any follow-up visit. The use of IOP lowering therapy was also recorded.


      The mean age (71 ± 13 years), mean number of injections (9.6 ± 2.7), and median follow-up time (392 ± 57 days) were similar between groups. The incidence of IOP ≥ 21 mm Hg was 34% (34/100) in the IS group and 15% (15/100) in the SFS group (p = 0.025). The incidence of IOP ≥ 30 mm Hg was 8% (8/100) in the IS group and 0% (0/100) in the SFS group (p =0.004). The incidence of IOP-lowering therapy was 13% in the IS group and 0% in the SFS group (p =0.0002).


      The incidence of OHT and treatment with IOP-lowering therapy significantly decreased after the introduction of filtered anti-VEGF medication and silicone-free syringes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Nicholson BP
        • Schachat AP.
        A review of clinical trials of anti-VEGF agents for diabetic retinopathy.
        Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248: 915-930
        • Li E
        • Donati S
        • Lindsley KB
        • Krzystolik MG
        • Virgili G.
        Treatment regimens for administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 5 (CD012208)
        • Pielen A
        • Feltgen N
        • Isserstedt C
        • Callizo J
        • Junker B
        • Schmucker C.
        Efficacy and safety of intravitreal therapy in macular edema due to branch and central retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2013; 8: e78538
        • Falkenstein IA
        • Cheng L
        • Freeman WR.
        Changes of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (avastin).
        Retina. 2007; 27: 1044-1047
        • Kahook MY
        • Kimura AE
        • Wong LJ
        • Ammar DA
        • Maycotte MA
        • Mandava N.
        Sustained elevation in intraocular pressure associated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections.
        Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009; 40: 293-295
        • Adelman RA
        • Zheng Q
        • Mayer HR.
        Persistent ocular hypertension following intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections.
        J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 26: 105-110
        • Good TJ
        • Kimura AE
        • Mandava N
        • Kahook MY.
        Sustained elevation of intraocular pressure after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95: 1111-1114
        • Atchison EA
        • Wood KM
        • Mattox CG
        • Barry CN
        • Lum F
        • MacCumber MW.
        The real-world effect of intravitreous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs on intraocular pressure: an analysis using the IRIS registry.
        Ophthalmology. 2018; 125: 676-682
        • Hoguet A
        • Chen PP
        • Junk AK
        • et al.
        The effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents on intraocular pressure and glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
        Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn). 2019; 126: 611-622
        • Eadie BD
        • Etminan M
        • Carleton BC
        • Maberley DA
        • Mikelberg FS.
        Association of repeated intravitreous bevacizumab injections with risk for glaucoma surgery.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017; 135: 363-368
        • Maes N
        • Schendel S
        • Liu J
        • Docherty G
        • Tadrous C.
        Incidence of glaucoma surgeries related to intravitreal anti-VEGF injections.
        in: Abstract presented at: Glaucoma Session - Canadian Ophthalmology Society Annual Meeting. 2020 (Accessed March 1, 2021)
        • Ricca AM
        • Morshedi RG
        • Wirostko BM.
        High intraocular pressure following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: proposed pathophysiology due to altered nitric oxide metabolism.
        J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 31: 2-10
        • Schargus M
        • Werner BP
        • Geerling G
        • Winter G.
        Contamination of anti-VEGF drugs for intravitreal injection: how do repackaging and newly developed syringes affect the amount of silicone oil droplets and protein aggregates?.
        Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2018; 38: 2088-2095
        • Kertes PJ
        • Galic IJ
        • Greve M
        • et al.
        Canadian Treat-and-Extend Analysis Trial with ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular disease: one-year results of the Randomized Canadian Treat-and-Extend Analysis Trial with Ranibizumab Study.
        Ophthalmology. 2019; 126: 841-848
        • Lode HE
        • Gjølberg TT
        • Foss S
        • et al.
        A new method for pharmaceutical compounding and storage of anti-VEGF biologics for intravitreal use in silicone oil-free prefilled plastic syringes.
        Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 18021
        • van Asten F
        • Michels CTJ
        • Hoyng CB
        • et al.
        The cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab, ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration—a cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13e0197670
        • Chakravarthy U
        • Harding SP
        • Rogers CA
        • et al.
        A randomised controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alternative treatments to Inhibit VEGF in Age-related choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN).
        Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19: 1-298
        • Yannuzzi NA
        • Klufas MA
        • Quach L
        • et al.
        Evaluation of compounded bevacizumab prepared for intravitreal injection.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 133: 32-39
        • VanderBeek BL
        • Bonaffini SG
        • Ma L.
        Association of compounded bevacizumab with postinjection endophthalmitis.
        JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 133: 1159-1164
        • Heiss-Harris GM
        • Verklan MT.
        Maximizing patient safety: filter needle use with glass ampules.
        J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005; 19: 74-81
        • Montero JA
        • Ruiz-Moreno JM
        • Sanchis-Merino E.
        Intravitreal ranibizumab, with or without filter?.
        Acta Ophthalmologica. 2012; 90: e405-e406
        • Melo GB
        • Cruz NFS
        • da, Emerson GG
        • et al.
        Critical analysis of techniques and materials used in devices, syringes, and needles used for intravitreal injections.
        Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021; 80100862
        • Martin DF
        • Maguire MG
        • Fine SL
        • et al.
        Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 1388-1398
        • Berg K
        • Pedersen TR
        • Sandvik L
        • Bragadóttir R.
        Comparison of ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration according to LUCAS treat-and-extend protocol.
        Ophthalmology. 2015; 122: 146-152
        • Chakravarthy U
        • Harding SP
        • Rogers CA
        • et al.
        Ranibizumab versus bevacizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration: one-year findings from the IVAN randomized trial.
        Ophthalmology. 2012; 119: 1399-1411
        • Emerson GG.
        Silicone oil droplets are more common in fluid from BD insulin syringes as compared to other syringes.
        J VitreoRetin Dis. 2017; 1: 401-406
        • Thompson JT.
        Prospective study of silicone oil microdroplets in eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in 3 different syringes.
        Ophthalmol Retina. 2021; 5: 234-240
        • Bakri SJ
        • Ekdawi NS.
        Intravitreal silicone oil droplets after intravitreal drug injections.
        Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2008; 28: 996-1001
        • Liu L
        • Ammar DA
        • Ross LA
        • Mandava N
        • Kahook MY
        • Carpenter JF.
        Silicone oil microdroplets and protein aggregates in repackaged bevacizumab and ranibizumab: effects of long-term storage and product mishandling.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52: 1023-1034
        • Kahook MY
        • Liu L
        • Ruzycki P
        • et al.
        High-molecular-weight aggregates in repackaged bevacizumab.
        Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2010; 30: 887-892
      1. The American Society of Retina Specialists. Avella releases comment on Avastin order backlog.
        2021 (Accessed March 21)
        • Mueller GP
        • Driscoll WJ.
        Biosynthesis of oleamide.
        Vitam Horm. 2009; 81: 55-78
        • Dounce SM
        • Laskina O
        • Goldberg RA.
        Particulate matter from syringes used for intravitreal injections.
        Retina. 2021; 41: 827-833
        • de Vries VA
        • Bassil FL
        • Ramdas WD.
        The effects of intravitreal injections on intraocular pressure and retinal nerve fiber layer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 13248
        • Kitchens JW
        • Do DV
        • Boyer DS
        • et al.
        Comprehensive review of ocular and systemic safety events with intravitreal aflibercept injection in randomized controlled trials.
        Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 1511-1520
        • Wingard JB
        • Delzell DA
        • Houlihan NV
        • Lin J
        • Gieser JP.
        Incidence of glaucoma or ocular hypertension after repeated anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections for macular degeneration.
        Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2019; 13: 2563-2572
        • Foss AJE
        • Scott LJ
        • Rogers CA
        • et al.
        Changes in intraocular pressure in study and fellow eyes in the IVAN trial.
        Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100: 1662-1667
        • Buller C
        • Johnson DH
        • Tschumper RC.
        Human trabecular meshwork phagocytosis. Observations in an organ culture system.
        Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31: 2156-2163
        • Niyadurupola N
        • Broadway DC.
        Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma—a major review.
        Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008; 36: 868-882
        • Crul M
        • Zandvliet A
        • Moes JR
        • Veenbaas T
        • Smeets O.
        Bevacizumab for intravitreal injection: impact of sub-visible particles on the shelf-life of repackaged bevacizumab.
        J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 35: 372-375
        • Pereboom M
        • Becker ML
        • Amenchar M
        • Verweij SL
        • van der Hoeven RTM
        • Mulder IJ.
        Stability assessment of repackaged bevacizumab for intravitreal administration.
        Int J Pharm Compd. 2015; 19: 70-72