Advertisement

Success of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society’s first virtual meeting amid COVID-19 pandemic

Published:October 07, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.09.007

      Abstract

      Objective

      To assess participant attendance and engagement for an in-person Canadian Ophthalmological Society (COS) annual meeting (2019) compared with a virtual COS annual meeting (2020).

      Design

      Retrospective case-control study of key event metrics of the 2019 and 2020 COS meetings as well as Twitter activity.

      Methods

      Key annual meeting metrics were collected retrospectively for 2020 virtual meeting and compared with the most recent in-person annual meeting cohort from 2019. Metrics collected included attendance by ophthalmology specialist, geographic distribution of attendees, postevent survey rate, and social media engagement (Twitter).

      Results

      Overall, there was a 7% (n = 60) increase in the number of registrants between 2019 and 2020. The largest change noted was the increase in registrants from British Columbia (n = 78). More ophthalmologists registered for the 2020 meeting than for 2019 meeting (627 versus 592). Of those who registered for the meeting, meeting participation (defined as checking in for the 2019 and logging in for the 2020 meetings) increased from 70% in 2019 to 79% in 2020. There was a 158% (n = 15 000) increase in tweet impressions in 2020 compared with 2019.

      Conclusion

      The first COS virtual meeting attracted more participants and was available to a geographically wider audience. Indeed, more professionals from provinces that are geographically further from the traditional COS meeting locations were able to participate in the event. Meeting engagement on a social media platform increased in the virtual meeting in 2020 relative to the in-person meeting in 2019, and possible enablers for increased engagement should be sought and incorporated into future meetings.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Harissi-Dagher M.
        COVID-19 and continuing professional development: an opportunity for inclusion.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2021; 56: 2-3
        • Gupta MP
        • Sridhar J
        • Wykoff CC
        • Yonekawa Y.
        Ophthalmology conferences in the coronavirus disease 2019 era.
        Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020; 31: 396-402
      1. Dodd K. Measuring up: 9 metrics to track event success. Expo Logic blog, June 26, 2017, https://www.eventtechsoftware.com/blog/-9-metrics-to-measure-event-success.

        • Sarabipour S.
        Virtual conferences raise standards for accessibility and interactions.
        Elife. 2020; 9: e62668
        • Wilson N
        • Valencia V
        • Smith-Bindman R.
        Virtual meetings: improving impact and accessibility of CME.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 231-232
        • Sarabipour S
        • Khan A
        • Seah S
        • et al.
        Evaluating features of scientific conferences: a call for improvements.
        bioRxiv. 2021; (Published online January 12020.04.02.022079)
        • Kisilevsky E
        • Margolin E
        • Kohly RP.
        Access, an unintended consequence of virtual continuing medical education during COVID-19: a department's experience at the University of Toronto.
        Can J Ophthalmol. 2021; 56: e18-e19
        • Knoll MA
        • Griffith KA
        • Jones RD
        • Jagsi R.
        Association of gender and parenthood with conference attendance among early career oncologists.
        JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5: 1503
        • Awad NI
        • Cocchio C.
        Use of Twitter at a major national pharmacy conference.
        Am J Heal Pharm. 2015; 72: 65-69
        • Christiansen SM
        • Oetting TA
        • Herz NL
        • et al.
        Twitter at the 2014 and 2015 Annual Meetings of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
        Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 1835-1837
        • Allen CG
        • Andersen B
        • Chambers DA
        • Groshek J
        • Roberts MC.
        Twitter use at the 2016 Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health: analyzing #DIScience16.
        Implement Sci. 2018; 13: 34
        • Fathy C
        • Cehelyk E
        • Israilevich R
        • Deiner M
        • Venkateswaran N
        • Kim T.
        When ophthalmology goes virtual amid a pandemic: content analysis of the 2020 #ASCRSVirtualMeeting.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021; 47: 563-569
      2. Twitter. About Twitter, n.d., https://about.twitter.com/en

        • Wadhwa V
        • Latimer E
        • Chatterjee K
        • McCarty J
        • Fitzgerald RT.
        Maximizing the tweet engagement rate in academia: analysis of the AJNR Twitter feed.
        Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 38: 1866-1868