Advertisement

Refractive outcomes following bilateral implantation of a diffractive toric intraocular lens in a multisurgeon hospital setting

Published:November 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.11.001

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To assess residual postoperative refractive astigmatism following bilateral implantation of a trifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) in a real-world multisurgeon setting.

      Setting

      Six surgeons at two sites.

      Design

      Prospective multisurgeon study.

      Methods

      Bilateral implantation of a trifocal toric IOL (PanOptix; Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland) was performed in 140 eyes of 70 patients. Patients were assessed on day 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was residual astigmatism. Secondary endpoints included absolute prediction error, IOL rotation, binocular uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuities at near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance (6 m) and spectacle independence evaluated with the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction questionnaire.

      Results

      Mean preoperative cylinder was 1.25 ± 0.72 D and was 0.39 ± 0.28 D at 3 months postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, mean residual astigmatism was 0.39 ± 0.28 D (range, 0–1.25 D), and 118 eyes (84.3%) had postoperative astigmatism of 0.5 D or less. Mean absolute prediction error was 0.25 ± 0.21 D (range, 0–1.13 D), and 124 eyes (88.6%) had absolute prediction error of 0.5 D or less. At 3 months postoperatively, mean absolute rotation was 2.0 ± 2.7 degrees compared with baseline (range, 0–15 degrees), and 133 IOLs (95.0%) were within 5 degrees of the implanted axis. Additionally, 55 patients (79%) reported never or rarely using spectacles at near, 66 (94%) at intermediate, and 67 (96%) at distance.

      Conclusions

      The results of this study demonstrate that implantation with the PanOptix toric IOL can provide excellent refractive and visual outcomes with minimal residual astigmatism.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gatinel D
        • Houbrechts Y.
        Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39: 1093-1099
        • Garcia-Perez JL
        • Gros-Otero J
        • Sanchez-Ramos C
        • Blazquez V
        • Contreras I.
        Short term visual outcomes of a new trifocal intraocular lens.
        BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17: 72
        • Blehm C
        • Potvin R.
        Reported patient satisfaction and spectacle independence following bilateral implantation of the PanOptix trifocal intraocular lens.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2021; 15: 2907-2912
        • Kohnen T
        • Marchini G
        • Alfonso JF
        • et al.
        Innovative trifocal (quadrifocal) presbyopia-correcting IOLs: 1-year outcomes from an international multicenter study.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020; 46: 1142-1148
        • Cochener B
        • Lafuma A
        • Khoshnood B
        • Courouve L
        • Berdeaux G.
        Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2011; 5: 45-56
        • Schallhorn JM.
        Multifocal and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a comparison of data from the united states food and drug administration premarket approval trials.
        J Refract Surg. 2021; 37: 98-104
        • Hovanesian JA
        • Jones M
        • Allen Q.
        The PanOptix trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 active focus and ReSTOR 3.0-add multifocal lenses: a study of patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and uncorrected visual performance.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2021; 15: 983-990
        • Villegas EA
        • Alcon E
        • Artal P.
        Minimum amount of astigmatism that should be corrected.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 13-19
        • Budak K
        • Friedman NJ
        • Koch DD.
        Limbal relaxing incisions with cataract surgery.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24: 503-508
        • Nubile M
        • Carpineto P
        • Lanzini M
        • et al.
        Femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy for the correction of high astigmatism after keratoplasty.
        Ophthalmology. 2009; 116: 1083-1092
        • Mozayan E
        • Lee JK.
        Update on astigmatism management.
        Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014; 25: 286-290
        • Kessel L
        • Andresen J
        • Tendal B
        • Erngaard D
        • Flesner P
        • Hjortdal J.
        Toric intraocular lenses in the correction of astigmatism during cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 275-286
        • Kohnen T
        • Lwowski C
        • Hinzelmann L
        • et al.
        Presbyopia correction in astigmatic eyes using a toric trifocal intraocular lens with quadrifocal technology.
        J Refract Surg. 2020; 36: 638-644
        • Rementeria-Capelo LA
        • Contreras I
        • Garcia-Perez JL
        • Blazquez V
        • Ruiz-Alcocer J.
        Visual quality and patient satisfaction with a trifocal intraocular lens and its new toric version.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019; 45: 1584-1590
        • Blaylock JF
        • Hall B.
        Astigmatic results of a diffractive trifocal toric IOL following intraoperative aberrometry guidance.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14: 4373-4378
        • Rementeria-Capelo LA
        • Garcia-Perez JL
        • Gros-Otero J
        • Carrillo V
        • Perez-Lanzac J
        • Contreras I.
        Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses.
        Int Ophthalmol. 2021; 41: 163-172
        • Alpins N.
        Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27: 31-49
        • Lehmann RP
        • Houtman DM.
        Visual performance in cataract patients with low levels of postoperative astigmatism: full correction versus spherical equivalent correction.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2012; 6: 333-338
        • Lim DH
        • Han JC
        • Kim MH
        • Chung ES
        • Chung TY.
        Factors affecting near vision after monofocal intraocular lens implantation.
        J Refract Surg. 2013; 29: 200-204
        • Trindade F
        • Oliveira A
        • Frasson M.
        Benefit of against-the-rule astigmatism to uncorrected near acuity.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23: 82-85
        • Ison M
        • Scott J
        • Apel J
        • Apel A.
        Patient expectation, satisfaction and clinical outcomes with a new multifocal intraocular lens.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2021; 15: 4131-4140
        • Carreno E
        • Carreno EA
        • Carreno R
        • Carreno M
        • Lopez V
        • Potvin R.
        Refractive and visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in a large population.
        Clin Ophthalmol. 2020; 14: 369-376
        • Kawahara A.
        Prediction of postoperative refractive astigmatism before toric intraocular lens implantation.
        BMC Ophthalmol. 2021; 21: 202
        • Yang JJ
        • Qin YZ
        • Qin L
        • Li JM.
        Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof IQ and TECNIS toric intraocular lenses: a real-world study.
        Exp Ther Med. 2020; 20: 25
        • Ribeiro FJ
        • Ferreira TB.
        Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses.
        J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020; 46: 694-699